-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Fix branch naming with empty string #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @H0ARK, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily addresses an edge case in the branch naming utility to ensure robustness when handling empty string inputs. It also includes a necessary compatibility layer for the override typing decorator, resolving a reported test failure and preparing for broader usage of this feature.
Highlights
- Branch Naming Fix: The
get_head_branch_nameutility function now correctly treats an empty string ("") the same way it treatsNone, generating a default branch name in both cases. Previously, onlyNonetriggered the default name generation. - Typing Compatibility: Introduced a new module
typing_compatto provide a backward-compatible import for thetyping.overridedecorator, supporting Python versions older than 3.12 by falling back totyping_extensions. - Regression Test: Added a new unit test specifically for the
get_head_branch_namefunction to ensure that passing an empty string results in a generated branch name.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR ensures that an empty branch_name is treated like None (generating a codegen-<uuid> name), adds a regression test for this case, and provides a compatibility shim for the override typing helper.
- Treat empty strings as missing branch names in
get_head_branch_name - Add a test to cover the empty-string branch-name scenario
- Add
typing_compat.overridefallback import for Python <3.12
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| tests/unit/codegen/runner/utils/test_branch_name.py | Added test_get_head_branch_name_empty_string |
| src/codegen/shared/typing_compat.py | Introduced fallback import for override from typing_extensions |
| src/codegen/runner/utils/branch_name.py | Expanded get_head_branch_name to handle empty strings and added a docstring |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)
tests/unit/codegen/runner/utils/test_branch_name.py:31
- Consider also asserting that the generated name does not include the
-group-suffix whengroup=None, e.g.,assert "-group-" not in branch_name.
assert branch_name.startswith("codegen-")
src/codegen/shared/typing_compat.py:1
- It could be valuable to add a unit test for this file to verify that
overrideis imported fromtypingwhen available and falls back totyping_extensionswhen not.
try:
src/codegen/runner/utils/branch_name.py:7
- [nitpick] The docstring could be extended to include parameter and return descriptions (e.g., explain
branch_name,group, and the returned format).
"""Return a sanitized branch name for the PR head.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This PR correctly addresses handling empty branch names in get_head_branch_name and adds a necessary regression test. It also introduces a standard compatibility shim for typing.override.
The primary concern is the test failure cannot import name 'override' from 'typing' mentioned in the PR description. This likely indicates that typing_extensions is not available in the test environment for older Python versions. Please ensure typing_extensions is added as a project dependency to resolve this, allowing the fallback in typing_compat.py to function correctly.
The code changes within the diff appear sound and do not present issues of medium or higher severity.
Summary
get_head_branch_nameoverrideTesting
pytest tests/unit/codegen/runner/utils/test_branch_name.py::test_get_head_branch_name_empty_string(fails: cannot import name 'override' from 'typing')https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_684d6b0004a4832ebf7d5729dd0e53bd