Coroutine support

[edwardbr]

Hi is there any thought of being able to step over coroutine suspend points without diving into an executor? I.e. so that you can pretend that co_await and co_return does not exist?

[aesilevich]

Hello!

Thanks for reaching out to us about adding a new feature to the debugger. We think your idea of being able to step over coroutine suspend points without diving into an executor is really interesting, and we did a little research on it. Based on what we found, it seems like it might be possible to implement this feature, but we'll need to do some more investigation to make sure.

In any case, we think it's a great idea, and we'll plan to look into it further for one of our upcoming releases this year. Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts with us! Let us know if you have any other ideas or questions.

[edwardbr]

I Hope that it gives you an edge on your competition!

…

On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 23:18, aesilevich ***@***.***> wrote: Hello! Thanks for reaching out to us about adding a new feature to the debugger. We think your idea of being able to step over coroutine suspend points without diving into an executor is really interesting, and we did a little research on it. Based on what we found, it seems like it might be possible to implement this feature, but we'll need to do some more investigation to make sure. In any case, we think it's a great idea, and we'll plan to look into it further for one of our upcoming releases this year. Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts with us! Let us know if you have any other ideas or questions. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGOJ6FHMFGDHTX5VZF4RXTW5IZOFANCNFSM6AAAAAAVSJCSKI> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>