Skip to content

automated docs review #431

@zeroXbrock

Description

@zeroXbrock

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

It would be great if there was a CI job that could read the docs, run the examples, and make sure everything was still correct as we merge new PRs. As time passes and features get added/removed, docs (especially those that are example-oriented) can drift away from usefulness.

Describe the solution you'd like

There are a lot of possible solutions to this problem. We could use a simple parser to extract the rust examples and run them, but that could get convoluted quickly. We could also use AI. I don't know which is the best yet, but I'm just writing this quickly so a discussion can start.

The goal (first & foremost) ensure accuracy of code examples in docs.

If we can add AI code reviews and recommendations related to the PR (i.e. to remind the PR's dev to update the docs) that would be an excellent addition.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or requesthelp wantedExtra attention is needed

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions