From 9bd82abe4dc44d1790da9eade7f0cf7ad0bae44d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bowman <bowmanpete123@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:32:46 +1300
Subject: [PATCH] Solution Implemented in Python

---
 .../Solutions/PeterBPythonSolution.py         | 114 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Challenges/MyShinyChain/Solutions/PeterBPythonSolution.py

diff --git a/Challenges/MyShinyChain/Solutions/PeterBPythonSolution.py b/Challenges/MyShinyChain/Solutions/PeterBPythonSolution.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a29bec6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Challenges/MyShinyChain/Solutions/PeterBPythonSolution.py
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+#
+# Our PM ask us to create a function for password validation
+# Some of the validation rules are the following:
+# - Password cannot be less than 8 characters
+# - Password cannot be greater than 20 characters
+# - Password must have, at least, one capital letter
+# - Password must have, at least, one number
+# - Password must have, at least, one special character from this list !@#$%^&*
+# The following is our first solution
+#
+
+def nomax_is_password_valid(password):
+    if 8 <= len(password):
+            # Checking for capital letter
+            one_capital = False
+            for letter in password:
+                if letter.isupper():
+                    one_capital = True
+                    break
+
+            if one_capital == False:
+                return False
+
+            # Checking for numbers
+            one_number = False
+            for letter in password:
+                if letter.isdigit():
+                    one_number = True
+                    break
+
+            if one_number == False:
+                return False
+
+            # Checking for special characters
+            one_special_character = False
+            special_characters = "!@#$%^&*"
+            for letter in password:
+                for special_character in special_characters:
+                    if letter == special_character:
+                        one_special_character = True
+                        break
+
+                if one_special_character == True:
+                    break
+
+            if one_special_character == False:
+                return False
+
+            return True
+    return False
+
+
+def is_password_valid(password, maxlengthenabled = True):
+    if not maxlengthenabled:
+        return nomax_is_password_valid(password)
+    elif 8 <= len(password) <= 20:
+            # Checking for capital letter
+            one_capital = False
+            for letter in password:
+                if letter.isupper():
+                    one_capital = True
+                    break
+
+            if one_capital == False:
+                return False
+
+            # Checking for numbers
+            one_number = False
+            for letter in password:
+                if letter.isdigit():
+                    one_number = True
+                    break
+
+            if one_number == False:
+                return False
+
+            # Checking for special characters
+            one_special_character = False
+            special_characters = "!@#$%^&*"
+            for letter in password:
+                for special_character in special_characters:
+                    if letter == special_character:
+                        one_special_character = True
+                        break
+
+                if one_special_character == True:
+                    break
+
+            if one_special_character == False:
+                return False
+
+            return True
+    return False
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    print(is_password_valid('Abcdefa4!'))
+    print(is_password_valid('Abcdefa4'))
+    print(is_password_valid('Abcdefa4abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'))
+    print(is_password_valid('Abcdefaa!'))
+    print(is_password_valid('abcdefa4!'))
+    print(is_password_valid('Abcdefa4a'))
+    # unittest.main()
+
+
+#
+# The PM now is asking us to reuse the password validator function
+# in other part of the solution, but without applying max length restriction
+# additionally, we will need to include another rule that must apply only
+# for this call, but that functionality will be provided later.
+#
+# HINT: There is a design pattern called "chain of responsibility" that could
+# fit perfectly for this case. Try to apply it.
+#